Jump to content
DDlg Forum & Community Welcome home !

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi I'm new here. You can call me Lulu. I've always known I was a middle.  Teenage years, I fluctuate. 

This isn't the same as being a little and often not as interesting for many which I understand. I just don't know if I belong anywhere with this, if it might be of interest to a daddy or a caregiver, especially since it's mainly non sexual for me, like 80% of the time. 

Edited by tealulu
  • Like 1
  • Hugs 2
Posted

Hi, Lulu!  I'm also new to the forum. 

And I just want to say that there is someone out there who is interested. The CG/L (and BDSM) world is so diverse, and everyone's interests are packaged in a way that is unique to them. Being a mostly non-sexual middle is completely valid. And there is very likely someone who wants exactly what you are offering. I'm sorry if anyone has made you feel that you don't belong. Because you do. You belong just as much as anyone else.

 Hugs GIF

 

  • 100 percent yes 1
Posted

Thank you so much for the kind response. Loading Hug GIF by MOODMAN

2 hours ago, edens_honey said:

Hi, Lulu!  I'm also new to the forum. 

And I just want to say that there is someone out there who is interested. The CG/L (and BDSM) world is so diverse, and everyone's interests are packaged in a way that is unique to them. Being a mostly non-sexual middle is completely valid. And there is very likely someone who wants exactly what you are offering. I'm sorry if anyone has made you feel that you don't belong. Because you do. You belong just as much as anyone else.

 Hugs GIF

 

 

  • Hugs 1
Posted

Hi Lulu,

Firstly, welcome!

Now onto what I really wanted to say: yes, littles and middles are different, but that doesn’t mean you’re any less wanted, needed, or valid. DDLG is just one variation of a CG/l dynamic, and middles still very much fall under the “little” umbrella. So do babygirls/babyboys who don’t regress or connect with a younger headspace. All valid. All worthy. All needed.

There are littles, middles, babygirls/babyboys, CGs, mummies, and daddies who want sexual relationships, and others who don’t. Both are beautiful. Neither is more valid than the other.

In my opinion, it would be incredibly boring if we all presented the same. Our differences are what make this space so rich and important.

I’m truly sorry you were ever made to feel like you had to ask if you belonged - but I’m really glad you did, because the answer is yes. 100% yes.

love, snuggles 

  • 100 percent yes 2
Posted

Hiya, I'm sometime little, sometimes middle. I think I get some of what you mean, not least that outwardly it seems closer to acting like an adult. And I guess it's very underrepresented basically everywhere. It is valid though, and we do exist. 

Slightly different, but I do relate to feeling like lack of wanting sex narrows down partner options, even though I'm just asexual, in every headspace.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...