is SD-dl a thing?

[DanishVikingDaddy]

Hi good people.

Fairly new to the DDlg kink - or at least new to having a label to put on my preferences. Somewhat anyway... Very new to this forum though, and my first post feels von topic and still kinda off... Admins please move to adequate section if needed... 

So... I have a specific "side-kink/chain-of-thought/desire/fantasy/insert-more-adequate-words-yourself" The fantasy, yeah let's stick with fantasy... Revolves around having the roles turned. SubmissiveDaddy-DominantLittle!?!? - surely I can't be the only one with this twisted line of thought....

Any and all sincere replies will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

[GrampyP]

I have zero experience but I'm pretty sure that I'd be one, with some limits of course. Or maybe a switch. But I doubt that I could ever not be responsible.

cgL or Cgl or cgl   or possibly   ddLG or ddlg

But to me it doesn't really matter the connection is what matters.

[Cebakes]

2 hours ago, DanishVikingDaddy said:

Hi good people.

Fairly new to the DDlg kink - or at least new to having a label to put on my preferences. Somewhat anyway... Very new to this forum though, and my first post feels von topic and still kinda off... Admins please move to adequate section if needed... 

So... I have a specific "side-kink/chain-of-thought/desire/fantasy/insert-more-adequate-words-yourself" The fantasy, yeah let's stick with fantasy... Revolves around having the roles turned. SubmissiveDaddy-DominantLittle!?!? - surely I can't be the only one with this twisted line of thought....

Any and all sincere replies will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Within the past week I saw a little here discussing the exact same thing and relationship that she has with her daddy. So yes it is out there.

[moondust mochi]

Hi! This isn't necessarily so much of a fantasy as it is a relationship dynamic, tbh. And it absolutely exists. I always, always link Satan in discussions like this because she was the first Dominant Little I ever met, but they're very real and very active. Think Princess x Her Royal Advisor dynamic. This sort of bleeds into the idea of service daddies, too! There's hundreds of ways to do this dynamic. You definitely aren't alone for the way you want to do yours. 

[DanishVikingDaddy]

55 minutes ago, moondust mochi said:

Hi! This isn't necessarily so much of a fantasy as it is a relationship dynamic, tbh. And it absolutely exists. I always, always link Satan in discussions like this because she was the first Dominant Little I ever met, but they're very real and very active. Think Princess x Her Royal Advisor dynamic. This sort of bleeds into the idea of service daddies, too! There's hundreds of ways to do this dynamic. You definitely aren't alone for the way you want to do yours. 

Feeling understood - feeling you fit in somewhere, can never be underrated. Thank you for clarifying that my fantasy is really a dynamic with many faces ❤️

[daddymind]

This is basically the dynamic I have with my Princess. I am her service sub/slave but also daddy/caregiver. There's some crossover here with DDlg as even dominant daddies are typically very service oriented. But there are some key differences.

Instead of "daddy, please can I have XYZ", the dominant little will be more vocally demanding e.g. "DADDY! I want/do XYZ now!". 9 times out of 10 I will respond with "yes Princess". Other times I might try to negotiate.

She might use derogatory names for daddy such as "dummy" or "dumb dog". Daddy can be seen more as a loyal pet sometimes. Maybe she makes him sleep at her feet tonight 😊

Princess doesn't like punishment. She genuinely just wants her way. Her brattiness is not a means of seeking punishment, rather a way of getting daddy to meet her demands (since her being bratty just makes me want to submit more). If anything, it's the sub daddy who gets punished if he fails to meet those demands.

There's not much content out there on this dynamic, which is frustrating. But it actually works very naturally when you consider that a little can easily hold a lot of power if the caregiver is especially service oriented. It's all about where the power and control flows in the relationship. Being a dominant little just means that power and control may be expressed in a certain way, e.g. with a bratty, impulsive energy or by using vulnerability or cuteness as a form of manipulation.

As a service sub I could easily be submissive to a non-little domme. But there's something about serving a dominant little/middle that gives the dynamic such a fun and unique edge and allows for that caregiver side of me to be released in equal measure.